Sustainable Transportation Initiatives
Everything below is taken from here, starting at the end of page 4.
Sustainable Transportation Initiatives: Short-term Proposals
(September 19, 2007) Report from Deputy City Manager Richard Butts.
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council support, in principle, the short-term Sustainable Transportation Initiatives
contained in Appendix 1 to this report in order to achieve, in part, the reduction targets
for greenhouse gas emissions contained in the “Climate Change, Clean Air and
Sustainable Energy Action Plan” approved by City Council.
Re: Pedestrians:
2. City Council:
a. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to develop criteria for the
establishment of temporary pedestrian streets and zones, such as “Pedestrian
Sundays”, and identify the appropriate resources to assist in the implementation
and promotion of events satisfying these criteria;
b. direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation
with appropriate City staff, to assess opportunities to establish a permanent
pedestrian street and report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee
on a public consultation process for the review and implementation of such a
facility;
c. endorse, in principle, the following four types of enhancements at signalized
intersections, as described more fully in the body of this report and in
Appendix 2, which give significantly greater priority to, and enhanced safety
for, pedestrians:
i. increasing the pedestrian crossing clearance times;
ii. replacing the flashing “DON’T WALK” displays with flashing “WALK”
displays;
iii. introducing pedestrian scramble phases (Barnes’ dance) at appropriate
locations on a pilot project basis; and
iv. expanding the “leading pedestrian intervals” or pedestrian head-start
feature to other intersections;
d. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in accordance with
Recommendation No. 2.c.iii., above, to evaluate and implement “pedestrian
scramble phases” on a pilot project basis at the following intersections:
i. Bloor Street and Bay Street; and
ii. Bloor Street and Yonge Street;
e. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in accordance with
Recommendation No. 2.c.iv. above, to identify approximately 20 appropriate
intersections for the installation, in 2008, of “Leading Pedestrian Intervals”;
f. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with
appropriate City staff, to assess opportunities for the narrowing of pavements, in
order to widen sidewalks and enhance landscaping, in conjunction with the
design of all road reconstruction projects and that any feasible narrowings,
following appropriate public consultation, be incorporated accordingly;
g. direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to finalize the
Streetscape Manual and that this manual be used as the standard in the design
and reconstruction of all City streets; and
h. direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation
with appropriate City staff, to develop and report back on a comprehensive
“green corridor plan” that would establish priority north-south green corridors
across the waterfront and identify opportunities to link these initiatives with
capital works and development-related projects.
Re: Cycling:
3. City Council:
a. direct the Executive Director, Facilities and Real Estate to assess the feasibility
of a bike-station in the redevelopment of Union Station;
b. direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to assess the
feasibility of a Bike Share program for City staff at all Civic Centres and to
develop a business case for commuter and community public bike share
programs and report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee
on these initiatives;
c. authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to retain a
Transportation Consultant to undertake, in 2008, an Environmental Assessment
of an east-west bicycle route through the downtown area with the objective of
implementing the recommended route in 2009;
d. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on the feasibility
of establishing a bikeway on Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue, from Royal
York Road to Victoria Park Avenue, including the development of design
options and an assessment of the parking and traffic impacts, and report to the
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the results of this review; and
e. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the
General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to investigate the feasibility,
assess the maintenance requirements and responsibilities, undertake the detailed
design and enter into negotiations with the owners and operators of the rail and
hydro corridors for the implementation of the bicycle trails identified in the
approved Bike Plan within these corridors, and to report back on the results of
this review.
Re: Parking:
4. City Council:
a. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report on
modifications to the peak period stopping and parking restrictions on arterial
roads, where appropriate, on a City-wide basis in order to reduce traffic
congestion, improve surface transit service, and increase cyclist safety during
the “shoulder” periods; and
b. request the Greater Toronto Transportation Authority (GTTA) to develop, in
consultation with municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe, GO Transit,
and other motor coach carriers, a strategy for the construction of commuter
parking facilities throughout the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) in order to reduce
the number and length of single-occupant vehicle trips.
Re: Transit:
5. City Council:
a. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to review, in consultation
with the Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission, opportunities to
introduce or extend left turn prohibitions at intersections, or alternatively
introduce advanced exclusive left turn phases at signalized intersections, in
order to reduce the delays to streetcar service and enact the necessary by-laws to
implement these regulations as soon as possible;
b. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the
Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission, to explore opportunities
to improve the current system of traffic signal priority for transit vehicles so that
it would only apply to transit vehicles that are behind schedule or to maintain
headways;
c. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to review, in consultation
with the Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission, opportunities to
introduce transit queue jump lanes and far side bus bays to improve transit
service at congested intersections, keeping in mind the impact of these facilities
on sidewalks and landscaping at these locations;
d. endorse the implementation of shoulder bus lanes on the Don Valley Parkway,
between York Mills Road and Lawrence Avenue East;
e. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to request the Ministry of
Transportation, Ontario, to undertake whatever amendments to the Highway
Traffic Act are necessary to implement the shoulder bus lanes on the Don Valley
Parkway and to report on the implementation as soon as possible;
f. direct appropriate City and Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) staff to work
with the Province to investigate the feasibility of a pilot project that would see
the introduction of automated enforcement camera technology to enforce
turning, stopping and parking prohibitions that are designed to improve transit
service; and
g. direct the Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission to ensure that
all new Light Rail Transit (LRT) vehicles purchased by the TTC are equipped to
handle some form of Proof-of-Payment (POP) system.
Re: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Initiatives:
6. City Council show leadership in promoting transportation demand management (TDM)
strategies by:
a. directing staff to negotiate with the newly-created Greater Toronto
Transportation Authority (GTTA) and other municipalities within the region to
jointly fund and support the continuing TDM efforts of:
i. the region-wide Smart Commute Association; and
ii. the Smart Commute North Toronto, Vaughan and Smart Commute
Northeast local transportation management associations;
and that staff report back to Council by the end of 2007 for funding approval
upon completion of these negotiations.
b. supporting the implementation of the existing guidelines on alternative work
arrangements (including compressed work weeks, flexible work hours and parttime
hours) and directing the Executive Director, Human Resources to develop a
policy on “teleworking”;
c. supporting the provision of on-street, reserved parking spaces for car sharing
vehicles in selected locations; and
d. encouraging the GTTA to undertake, as a priority, a region-wide study of road
pricing.
Re: Other Initiatives:
7. City Council:
a. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Planner and
Executive Director, City Planning, to report on:
i. the establishment of a permanent City staff committee to liaise with
representatives of the cartage and courier industries, building owners,
managers and tenants on commercial vehicle servicing issues, including
the access and parking needs of pick-up, delivery and servicing vehicles;
and
ii. possible strategies to encourage a greater proportion of courier deliveries
and pick-ups to be made by bicycle;
b. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to incorporate the
assessment of both the off-street and on-street impacts of the loading/pickup/
delivery/servicing needs of major new developments as a requirement of the
City’s new Traffic Impact Study guidelines that staff are currently developing;
c. endorse the use of taxis as an acceptable sustainable transportation alternative
and direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with
representatives of the taxi industry, to examine opportunities and measures to
make taxis more convenient and readily available to users;
d. direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a review of
the existing operations and regulations of the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
lanes in the City and report on effective changes, and that the GTTA take the
lead in a review of HOV facilities throughout the GTA to ensure consistency
and continuity on a region-wide basis; and
e. request the GTTA to meet with the transportation agencies in the GTA to
explore opportunities for collaborative Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
initiatives.
Re: Monitoring the Effectiveness of These Initiatives:
8. City Council:
a. direct staff of Transportation Services and City Planning to work with staff of
the Toronto Environment Office (TEO) to develop improved methods for
measuring the environmental impacts of sustainable transportation initiatives for
inclusion in the broader monitoring and evaluation framework proposed by the
Climate Change Plan.
Financial Impact
Most of the short-term sustainable transportation initiatives presented in this report can be implemented from funding within the Transportation Services 2007 Capital Budget and the proposed 2008 Capital Budget. Some of the proposals, however, need to be further developed and assessed in terms of their potential financial impact and funding requirements. These financial impacts, including the identification of any potential funding partnerships with other orders of government, will be addressed in any future reports required for the approval of these specific initiatives.
The Smart Commute North Toronto, Vaughan and the Smart Commute Northeast
transportation management associations have been funded, in part, by the City Planning Division in the amount of $135,000.00 annually, over the last three years. Currently, funding arrangements for the Smart Commute Association (SCA) and the related activities of the local transportation management associations are at a transitional stage, while the newly-created Greater Toronto Transportation Authority (GTTA), in consultation with the regional municipalities, determines its role in meeting the gap created by the expiry of the federal government’s Urban Transportation Showcase Program, which had provided vital start-up funding during these three years. It is expected that similar contribution levels will be needed in the future, but the exact amounts cannot be determined until the current negotiations with the GTTA are concluded. City staff should be in a position to report to Council on the proposed
new funding arrangements for this program by the end of the year.
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.
Summary
City Council, in considering the “Climate Change, Clean Air and Sustainable Energy Action Plan: Moving from Framework to Action” (the “Climate Change Plan”) at its meeting on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2007, adopted, among other things, reduction targets for greenhouse gas emissions for the Toronto urban area as well as a reduction target for locally generated smog-causing pollutants. Reductions in these harmful emissions from the transportation sector can be brought about through a combination of technical, behavioural and urban structure changes.
The transportation-related recommendations contained in the “Climate Change Plan” are largely being dealt with separately. The purpose of this report is to present a number of additional sustainable transportation initiatives, beyond those contained in the “Climate Change Plan”, that could be implemented fairly quickly and, in most cases, at relatively little expense.
Although each initiative may seem modest in scope, collectively they signal a new way of looking at, implementing, and operating the City’s transportation system and provide a launch for more fundamental City-building changes that will be required to achieve the long-term vision of a truly sustainable transportation system for Toronto. These initiatives will also form a component of the longer-term and broader-scoped Sustainable Transportation Implementation Strategy that City Council, in dealing with the “Climate Change Plan”, has directed staff to prepare in order to achieve the reduction targets for greenhouse gas emissions and smog-causing pollutants.
Background Information
2007-10-03-pw09-2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/pw/bgrd/background...)
2007-10-03-pw09-2.app1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/pw/bgrd/background...)
2007-10-03-pw09-2.app2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/pw/bgrd/background...)
Communications
(September 29, 2007) e-mail from Lani Choi (PW.New.PW9.2.1)
(September 28, 2007) e-mail from Michael Polanyi (PW.New.PW9.2.2)
(September 28, 2007) e-mail from Zihao Li (Michael), Rosedale Heights School of the
Arts (PW.New.PW9.2.3)
(September 28, 2007) e-mail from Christine Stait-Gardner (PW.New.PW9.2.4)
(October 1, 2007) e-mail from Waleed Ahmed (PW.New.PW9.2.5)
(October 1, 2007) letter from Brian Shifman, Executive Director, Smart Commute - North
Toronto, Vaughan (PW.New.PW9.2.6)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Kristen Courtney (PW.New.PW9.2.7)
(October 2, 2007) letter from Fred Sztabinski, Project Co-ordinator, Toronto Coalition for
Active Transportation (TCAT) (PW.New.PW9.2.8)
(October 2, 2007) letter from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW9.2.9)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Kelsey Carriere (PW.New.PW9.2.10)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Albert Koehl, Bells on Bloor, Angela Bischoff, Take the
Tooker, and Kristen Courtney, Bikes on Bloor (PW.New.PW9.2.11)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Wayne Scott, Hoof & Cycle
(TOBMA) (PW.New.PW9.2.12)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Anglea Bischoff (PW.New.PW9.2.13)
(October 3, 2007) submission from Transportation Services and City
Planning (PW.New.PW9.2.14)
Speakers
Gary Welsh, General Manager, and John Mendes, Director, Transportation Infrastructure
Management,Transportation Services
Michael Louis Johnson, Streets are For People
Shamez Amlani, Streets are For People (Submission Filed)
Kelsey Carriere, Co-Founder, Streets are For People
Albert Koehl, Bells on Bloor
Hamish Wilson (Submission Filed)
Kristen Courtney (Submission Filed)
Don Watterson, Curbside Cycle
Helen Riley, Feet on the Street
Wayne Scott, Hoof & Cycle (Submission Filed)
Margaret Hastings-James
Margaret Hastings-James, on behalf of Angela Bischoff, , Take the Tooker (Submission Filed)
Justin Peters, Business Development Manager, Skymeter Corporation

Re: Bloor bikelanes from Royal York to Victoria Park
Once again the city appears to be missing it. Bicyclists NEED to be able to SAFELY cross ALL of the city. Build the lanes out to the Mississauga and Pickering borders. Motorists will have to learn to tolerate a modicum of INCONVENIENCE for the benefit of other entitled road users SAFETY.
Kingston Rd is already in the Bikeplan. Lets get on with it, eh?
you raise a good point Geoffrey.
We do have to start somewhere however, and it makes sense to start where things will be the most useful (as opposed to the current method of putting bike lanes where they will be the least controversial).
I definitely agree with you though; I really think it should be policy that any road repainting should include a bike lane.
I disagree with this:
Bike lanes help in some cases, and are a hindrance in many others. They should only be installed in situations where it might actually help cyclists. Useless bike lanes on quiet residential streets, or bike lanes that make it less safe or convenient to ride are a nuisance and waste of time/money.
Policy to improve conditions for cyclists? Yes, of course. But to push for bike lanes everywhere could backfire terribly.
Yes Vic, beside every bike lane should be a motor vehicle and a bus priority lane. It is only fair
:)
The Sustainable Transportation Initiatives reports specifically calls for all future developments and redevelopments to adhere to the official Streetscapes manual that will incorporate---from my understanding---appropriate widths for sidewalks AND bike lanes. It is the city's intent, apparently, to have bike lanes installed on any and all new streets. This proposal may have been ammended, but I doubt it will.
The pendulum is swinging the other way.
So 9.2 passed at council I hear.
Regarding my earlier comment about bike lanes everywhere, I don't think that they should be putting bike lanes in on side streets, but on thoroughfares I definitely think it should be policy to put in a bike lane or sharrows when they repaint a street. Maybe I am being really closed-minded, but I can't think of a situation where this would not be beneficial for cyclists.
The entire report was endorsed, apparently, according to the City of Toronto website. Some ammendments were added, but they seemed to be the addition of two intersections---as I mentioned before---that will be given the 'scramble' treatment and urging courier and delivery companies to pusue more walking and bicycle couriers in order to reduce the number of illegally parked / stopped delivery trucks. The TTC is also being asked to work with GTAA more and safety concerns for cyclists along College and Queen are to be assessed as well.
Here's the link:
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/cc/decisions/2007-...
Please post if you spot any changes to the original report that I may have missed. I banged this reply out quickly in order to get the good news out to you promptly.
Thanks to all for keeping us up to date!
It looks like there's one amendment to the cycling section.
Bike boxes are used in Vancouver. They look like a good thing to me. I wonder who proposed these amendments. One of the councillors?
-dj
-dj
and what are 'leading bicycle intervals?'
Bike Boxes are a space between the pedestrian crosswalk and where the motor vehicles stop into which bicycles can line up in front of the motor vehicles. We do this somewhat informally when we "filter" to the front at intersections, but this formalizes what we do already. An example of this type of infrastructure already exists in Canada in Vancouver, where it is quite popular with cyclists. Other cities in the US and Europe have also used this.
I assume 'leading bicycle interval' would be an advanced green just for cyclists. I'm thinking it's like what streetcars get when they operate on ROWs, but for cyclists.
Vancouver's bike boxes
That page has some images. I think a bike box only makes sense if there's a bike lane (even if it's only a short one leading up to the intersection), and a significant amount of bike traffic. Probably why they're looking at doing it on College.
-dj
-dj
Thanks Anthony and Darren.
I'm trying to understand how either idea will help improve safety and don't think I'll get it until I try them. With bike boxes, I don't immediately see the benefit of being able to ride along side a car and then move in front of it at the stop line when the car is likely to sit on my rear tire as soon as we get the green until he impatiently skims past me. Maybe I'm not seeing it clearly, I don't know. But if they are proving to be beneficial elsewhere, I'm game to give them a shot.
As with an advanced green for cyclists to prevent right-hooks, I already avoid them for the most part, by 'taking the lane,' sitting at least a third into the lane, sometimes more, thereby preventing a car from being able to move in beside me. I've only had a few impatient motorists honk at me and wave for me to move over and I simply point at the red light and suggest they wait until traffic in front of them has moved through the intersection. They wouldn't be able to make a turn with a car or truck in front of them and they should regard me similarly. If I filter up along the right, I move a little ahead of the car that 'might' turn and effectively block his turn when the light turn green or, if crossing traffic is light, I leave them room to make their turn. Both techniques seem to work for me.
But, as I said, I'm eager to give both ideas a look-see.