In a recent email discussion on Bixi and bikesharing in Toronto, Mikael Colville-Andersen
of copenhagenize.eu, made some good points about bikesharing: 1) bikesharing, to be successful, is aimed at citizens, not tourists, 2) bikesharing needs to be ubiquitous within the launch area, 3) the sudden surge of bikes makes it an effective tool for change and triggering better bike infrastructure. Just to clarify, Mikael is responding to some other comments that bikesharing was meant only for tourists, and it's not to imply that City staff were ever focusing on such a narrow demographic, quite the contrary.
Read his comments below:
Interesting following the discussion from the sidelines.
One thing that is worrying is the focus on tourists.
Every successful bike share programme in the world is not aimed at tourists, but rather the locals. There are 26 cities in France alone with successful bike share programmes and the local population is the focus. In fact, there are cities that make it difficult for tourists to rent them. In Seville, in Spain, your application takes a week to process. The main reason is to discourage tourists from using it. Otherwise it'll just end up as a gimmick.
Another thing is that visitors to a city won't use a bike share system if they don't see locals riding around on the bike share bikes or private bikes. Especially without sufficient infrastructure. So it's unlikely that tourists will be the main users in Toronto.
In lieu of visionary politicians who invest in necessary infrastructure and who tackle car traffic, a bike share system is the singlemost effective tool in the urban toolbox for encouraging citizens to take to the bicycle. It is a shame that the system may be delayed but the only way to ensure that such a system is a success is to go hard or go home. Carpet-bombing the city with racks and bikes is the first key to success. A few stations here or there is fuel on the fire of the sceptics. "See! They don't work! Nobody uses them!"
With a massive amount of bikes showing up from virtually one day to the next, it shows a city that the bikes are here to stay. Get used to it. Washington DC has a handful of bikes at a handful of awkwardly placed stations. Nobody uses them. If waiting for a more effective launch means more bikes and stations from day one, then that may be a good thing.
Since Vélib started in Paris, 2 million bicycles have been bought by Parisians. Vélib has been a massive success and has transformed the city. The people you rode the metro with are now waiting for the red light with you. Making the bicycle the quickest way to travel around a city is the surest way to ensure success and a bike share system is the golden opportunity to start the ball rolling.
It's important for all involved to realise these things and to work towards these common goals.
best regards,
Mikael
Comments
Cullen (not verified)
I think a bike share system
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 08:17I think a bike share system should be easy for EVERYONE to use, both tourist and local. Making it easy to walk up to a bike share vending machine a put in a credit card. There should be no need for a sign up for a one time ride. Now... if we want a frequent user plan which takes a few days to sign up for, that's great. But let's make it easy for walk up never before users to try it out. Otherwise, it'll never catch on.
Seymore Bikes
Everyday People
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 09:25I have spoken with several people who raved about Velib, but only one used it; the tourism value is apparently more image oriented than transit.
Antony (not verified)
I have a feeling that Toronto
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 10:19I have a feeling that Toronto isn't ready to do bike sharing right. Until the municipal election is settled, there won't be enough political certainty to get a large enough bikeshare network endorsed. And going with a compromised small-scale install will be worse than nothing.
Seymore Bikes
Screw the Politicians
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 11:42Get this done before anybody can induce political scuttle.
Martin Reis (not verified)
Bixi
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 17:43Went to Montreal over the Labour Day holiday last Summer. The city was filled with tourists on Bixis from around the world. I think we need to look at the track record of our beloved city as far as bikes are concerned and not expect too much.
brian
Velov
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 22:25Hi all,
I used the Velov system in Lyon, France, back in 2008. It was "interesting". I hadn't even heard of the system until I arrived in Lyon, and had only previously heard tell of CBN's Bikeshare system here. I own three bikes, and readily fly with any of them, all over the world.
Velov was easy to use (mostly because my host took care of the reservations and payment herself) and the bikes were somewhat simple and easy to ride (I compare with my 21" Trek 3700 commuter). The Velov "hybrid commuter" bike was solid and stable, and its integrated cargo rack was its best feature. I would have preferred my own saddle, and could have done without the cargo basket on the handlebars.
The biggest complaint I had was not knowing the rules of the road in Lyon, or the "common behaviours" of Lyon cyclists. In France, cars very much have the right of way on roads, and getting in front of a car, no matter whether right or wrong, will earn a cyclist a good earful of horn. It's very contradictory to most rides here in Toronto. The other notable exception was my lack of helmet, which made me feel underdressed, and thus more uncertain about my riding. Foremost on my mind was "don't do anything that could cause a fall!" Fear of being injured predominated my rides. Neither of these things had anything to do with the Velov system, but they affected my experience nonetheless, and I equate them with having used a bikeshare in a foreign city, which one could argue is part of the "tourist" experience.
All that said, I have nothing remarkable to note about the Velov system, or its stations, or how it worked. In fact, the only noteworthy thing I would mention is that JCDecaux was the prime motivator behind the system, and that to me adds up to private-sector startup funding. If it were a business proposition for our municipal government to consider, I would opine that Toronto is not ready for such a system, because the business case study isn't in; and my own perception, having done research on bikes-to-population in my ward, is that our citizens already have plenty of bikes available; people are just not interested in cycling because of their perceptions, not because of a lack of bikes.
Hope this helps.
Brian
simplicius2wheels
A visit in Montreal using the Bixi system
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 07:38I documented my experience last year. Here's what I noted:
About interaction with cars:
http://www.yip.org/~erhard/using_a_bike_in_montreal__2009.htm ****