The City had planned the Florence/Argyle and Lindsey/Dewson contraflow plans as a "quick win" back in 2008 as part of a west end bikeways plan. That was before everything got shelved due to (self-imposed) "contraflow legal purgatory". Now City staff are working hard to get the backlog of routes approved and painted, but local cycling groups are arguing that in the hurry they're leaving out the safe crossing bit.
Original 2008 West End Bikeways plan
The west end ward groups of Cycle Toronto—18, 19 and 14—have identified two bike routes where they cross Dufferin at Florence/Argyle and Lindsey/Dewson routes, in particular, as dangerous. In each case they were told that the crossings were too close to other traffic lights, so the staff won't put in additional lights. (Though it boggles my mind that it's perfectly acceptable for Loblaws to get a traffic light merely one block away from Church just for their parking garage, but it's unacceptable for safer bike routes. Clearly Loblaws has a lot of pull with the City. The City has lost the moral high ground on that point.)
Enough of my babbling, the ward groups say it better:
Specifically, we have serious concerns about the proposal to install these bike routes without providing for safe bike crossings at Dufferin Street in either case. While we understand that there is pressure to “get the lanes painted” as soon as possible, we believe that it is irresponsible to proceed with installation without addressing the route deficiencies at Dufferin. We have waited five years for these routes to be installed and, after all this time, it seems reasonable to expect that the designs incorporate safe, signalized crossings for cyclists travelling in both directions at Dufferin. Indeed, this issue was highlighted when City staff engaged in a walking tour of the Argyle contra-flow route with Ward 19 and 18 cyclists in March 2013.
Allow us to put these two routes in the context of what cyclists have actually sought by way of safe cycling routes in Toronto’s west end. Recall that these side-street routes were approved as “quick wins” to be installed after a 2008 public consultation that clearly demonstrated a preference for bike infrastructure on uninterrupted streets with signalized intersections, such as Dundas and Queen.
Florence to Argyle
Always looks easy when looking from above. Lindsey to Dewson
Where Florence meets Dufferin there is a pedestrian-activated crosswalk and a school on the east side with a path going through the school grounds. At Lindsey there is nothing. I expect that many people crossing at Florence will bike through the crosswalk—after activating the light—and then either bike down the sidewalk or through the school grounds. While not ideal, it's workable and we can fully blame the City for forcing this situation. And by City I don't mean to pick just on cycling planners, but the forces that be in Transportation Services that hold back more appropriate cycling infrastructure in favour of their golden calf, automobile throughput.
All hail the Holy Car.
Sam (not verified)
Crossing Dufferin is theWed, 03/19/2014 - 12:04
Crossing Dufferin is the biggest safety issue on the Hallam-Lappin and Wallace-Shanly routes farther north, as well. Installing stoplights (and re-working existing ones) so that they control BOTH cross-streets on the staggered routes makes sense for all users.
Charles Lidstone (not verified)
In practice, there is a fairWed, 03/19/2014 - 16:24
In practice, there is a fair bit of bike traffic on Dewson. People going along Harbord to Dufferin Mall, or people just linking up with Harbord in general maybe. There is also tons of bike through traffic on College. So, that Lindsey segment of bike lane just looks ridiculous to me. It doesn't seem to serve anybody.
That said, a couple of other observations..
I don't think a light at Dufferin/Lindsey would make much difference, there are already long gaps in traffic due to existing controls. Consider the light at Bloor and Walmer. I think it might actually make pedestrian crossings more dangerous than they used to be, and it is certainly a massive hassle for traffic along Bloor.
Meanwhile, city planning/transportation decided a light at Wellesley and Homewood was a good idea, and that is about the same distance from Sherbourne as Lindsey is from Homewood. That light is obviously serving a different constituency though :(