Art Crawl/Janet AttardArt Crawl/Janet Attard
New bike art on display at the Gladstone Hotel, which is on right now. You can see more of her fine bike art at the 401 Richmond.
All the info: Queen West Art Crawl
Art in the Fall/Nuit Blanche

A group of bicycling advocates called the Safe Cycling Coalition is going to be allowed to make their argument for Bloor Street bicycle lanes in Ontario court. They were granted the right to "intervene" in a court case initiated by a china shop against the city.

Could this be the start of a new trend for cyclists in Toronto? Will a lawsuit against the city be the next step?

The Safe Cycling Coalition issued a press release with details on the project and their motivations. The press release follows.

TORONTO: In what is likely the first intervention of its kind in Ontario legal history, a coalition of cycling advocates, the Safe Cycling Coalition, has sought and (yesterday) been granted the right to intervene in an Ontario court case.

The case, first brought to the Ontario Superior Court in August by certain downtown merchants, alleges that the City of Toronto violated the province's Environmental Assessment Act when it proceeded with the Bloor St. Transformation Project --- along Yorkville's so-called Mink Mile --- and failed to properly consult the public or to study alternatives.

"This is about one of Toronto's most valuable public spaces -- a $25 million 'transformation' of that space warrants public consultation," explains Margaret Hastings-James, a Bloor Street bike-commuter who began to advocate for bike lanes when hit, and nearly crushed, by a truck in 2002. "The huge volume of pedestrian and cyclist traffic in this area demands an allotment of dedicated and safe space."

The intervening citizen advocate group asserts that proper classification of the project would have allowed cyclists the opportunity to highlight provincial laws that direct municipalities to ensure the safety of all roadway. Cycling advocates have long pushed city politicians for a bike lane on Bloor St. -- one of the city's most heavily used, and most dangerous, cycling routes.

"The Bloor St. Transformation Project does have some positive features for pedestrian traffic," said Angela Bischoff, lead contact for the Coalition. "Unfortunately the City has again forgotten cyclists. Motor vehicles will get about 15 meters in width of the public roadway, and cyclists will get zero. That's not fair, and it's certainly not safe."
According to a 2007 Toronto Public Health report, 440 people die in Toronto each year from the effects of traffic pollution. The same report indicated that the death toll could be reduced dramatically by investing in cleaner options such as mass transit and better cycling infrastructure.

"The battle for safer cycling conditions in Toronto has now reached a new phase," said Albert Koehl, a lawyer representing the group. "The urgency of problems like global warming and air pollution means we can no longer tolerate old-school approaches to fixing our inefficient and dirty transportation system. Bicycles are zero-emission vehicles that deserve a safe space on our roads."

In August 2008 William Ashley China Ltd. filed an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court) for a declaration that the city's decision to proceed with the Bloor St. Transformation Project was illegal. On Sept. 9, 2008 the Safe Cycling Coalition applied to the Court for an order allowing it to intervene. The application was granted on Sept. 15.

The members of the Coalition include cycling advocates with over five decades of combined cycling advocacy experience. They include Angela Bischoff, Margaret Hastings-James, Hamish Wilson, Martin Reis, and Kristen Courtney.

The hearing of the case (William Ashley China Ltd. v. City of Toronto) is scheduled for Oct. 9, 2008.

Like a singular fish in a school of fish, you can rest assured that you are safer the more cyclists there are around you. That this might be the most important factor in your safety is the controversial conclusion of a recent study.

Science Daily reports on the study of this virtuous cycle from the University of New South Wales: the more people that cycle the safer it is for everyone. Dr Julie Hatfield, an injury expert from UNSW: "The likelihood that an individual cyclist will be struck by a motorist falls with increasing rate of bicycling in a community."

In fact, they found that "a community that doubles its cycling numbers can expect a one-third drop in the per-cyclist frequency of a crash with a motor vehicle."

The chicken and egg part of this is this: "And the safer cycling is perceived to be, the more people are prepared to cycle." So just how do we then get more people to bike?

The effect is independent of improvements in cycling-friendly laws and better infrastructure. This does not mean, however, that cycling-friendly laws and better infrastructure don't have a positive effect on the safety of cyclists. You can think of the safety-in-numbers effect as being a positive feedback cycle: the more cycling-friendly laws and bike-specific infrastructure, the more people perceive it is safe and start cycling thus increasing the safety of all cyclists in both a direct and indirect manner.

Cyclists consistently prefer to bike in areas with better bike infrastructure that doesn't require them to have "special equipment and training, physical fitness, and the courage and willingness to battle with motor vehicles on streets without separate bike lanes or paths".

Of course, it is possible that through some really effective media campaign the City could convince enough people that cycling is fun, safe, and efficient that they wouldn't have to spend any more on infrastructure in order to get this virtuous cycle started. I just don't think that this is going to happen. Instead I'm going to wait until a UBC study on cycling injuries in Vancouver and Toronto is finished before forming any strong opinions on the matter. They will be interviewing 600 Canadian cyclists and studying the sites of the crashes or collisions for detailed analysis.