Last week, riding home on College Street, I encountered a territorial idiot in the bike lane. This individual decided to open his car door into the bike lane, then stand beside it chatting on his cell phone. On seeing me, he closed his car door enough to leave me six inches to pass. I told him, politely but stiffly, that I needed more room than that, and he closed it almost completely. I rolled by him. From his comments about me not leaving the bike lane, he clearly thought he had the right to use it as a substitute living room.

Today, I ready the comments of Kerri from the CommuteOrlando Blog about "door zone" bike lanes, and I thought on one hand she has a point, but on the other hand, the term "door zone" seems to concede public space to the motorists who open their car doors carelessly, and leave them open.

Toronto does not have the road space available to give motorists who chooses to park on the street permanent control of the space a metre to the right of their cars. If we tried to exclude vehicles (all vehicles, including bicycles) from the zone three feet from any (legally or illegally) parked car, our traffic problems would go from bad to terminal. For that reason, the HTA quite properly places the onus on the person opening a car door or proposing to use a travel lane for chatting on a cell phone or looking for their keys, not the traffic trying to move.

Accidents in which cyclists get hit by car doors cause plenty of injuries and deaths. Good infrastructure design definitely plays a role in keeping cyclists safe. But in calling for better infrastructure design, it matters that we not use language that has the effect of conceding to motorists public space that the law does not grant them and which we cannot afford.

Infrastructure changes I would advocate to prevent dooring accidents include automotive construction standards: the safety standards for "crumple zones" of a car should include a prohibition on selling any car in Canada with a swing open door which will resist a force of more than 500 Newtons (enough to stop an adult cyclist in about a second) when hit in a typical "dooring" position.

Educational changes I would advocate include educating motorists, some of whom clearly do not know the law, but also educating ourselves as cyclists: what do we do when a door snaps open in front of us? If we can't avoid a collision with a car door, can we hit it in such a way as to minimize injury to ourselves and our bikes? It might actually help to research this, if we can.

George Smitherman, mayoral candidate, has published a "transportation plan", or, as I prefer to call it, a thinly veiled nod to motorists and patronizing approach to transit, cycling and walking. It may be easier in an era of a "war on cyclists" that a mayoral candidate can get away with a platform that does less for cyclists than what is in the Bike Plan already.

"Furious George" has adopted candidate Rossi's tactic of "supporting" cyclists so long as they get off all the major roads, by saying he'll provide "safer routes on less busy main roads" with a focus on bike "expressways". He seems to want to raise the ire of his past self who said weeks ago in response to Rossi's plan:

In terms of suggesting bicycles should be relegated to crescents and cul-de-sacs, this is akin to saying you’re not in favour of the city of Toronto being a modern city… I don’t think it’s leadership to take the language of the war on the car and flip it on its head and say, “The war on the car has had its go at city hall. I’m going to advance the war on the bike.”

So where's this modern city, George, while you're trying shove all the cyclists into the ravines and hydro corridors like so much garbage?

Here's the fine print on George's plan:

  • Time out on construction of new bike lanes on arterial roadways, but move immediately to ensure current cycling routes are safer and better maintained

Why the time out? Until when? And why not have a time out on improvements for all road users until you figure things out? Why do only cyclists have to suffer?

  • physical separation of bikes and cars: bicycle lanes should be separated from cars with properly curbed lanes, so everyone can travel more safely

Many cyclists like the idea of physical separation but there so many places where this is impractical because of parked cars and such.

  • Moving forward, expedite the expansion of dedicated bike “expressways” though hydro corridors, ravines and other non-roadways by 2015

George is promising work that is already being built: push the hydro corridors that already have time lines established by their receipt of federal stimulus money. The schedule of construction and completion has already been set (see the long list of trails being built this year) and no Mayoral candidate can change that. By the time George got into office he would be just in time for the ribbon cutting.

Even if these were new initiatives, there is likely no chance that any of them will be any use to Central Toronto commuters - for cyclists commuting in the area bounded by Keele to Coxwell, St. Clair to the lake.

  • Increase opportunities for children to learn bike safety and rules of the road

Always a nice thing, but very vague. Is this going to be introduced in schools?

  • Better maintenance of bike routes—including year round upkeep, with snow clearance on bike expressways

And snow clearance on bike lanes, I hope.

  • Integration of cycling into Toronto’s planning and transit, by looking at incentives and possible partnerships to build a better bike infrastructure. Toronto should consider better bike parking at TTC stations, shower facilities and other ideas that make it easier for “dual-mode commuting” (riding to a TTC or GO station and hopping on transit).

A lot of this work is already being done. City staff are already planning bike stations at TTC stations.

"[O]ver the past year, rhetoric against this simple transportation mode has so infected the mayor's race the provision of safe cycling infrastructure will likely become a relic of the David Miller era after the fall election." I hope InsideToronto is wrong and that the new Mayor will take cyclists and their safety seriously and not simply try to make them disappear.

Coming up this Thursday is the community discussion on bike theft. The event is tied in with the KENK graphic novel that's made a splash over the news. Everyone likes to focus on a big personality like Igor who loved the attention, regardless of whether it was positive or negative. The truth is that bike theft still takes place and the guys who went around stealing bikes are still as active as ever.

The discussion will take place this Thursday, June 3, 2010, 8 - 10 pm at CineCycle (129 Spadina Ave - just south of Richmond and down the lane)

The confirmed panelists include:

  • Richard Goddard, Moderator (CBC)
  • Richard Poplak (Writer, KENK: A Graphic Portrait)
  • Yvonne Bambrick (Toronto Cyclists Union)
  • Eric Kamphof (Curbside Cycle)
  • Herb van den Dool (IBikeTO.ca)
  • Robert Tajti (14 Division Planner & Technical Coordinator, Toronto Police)

There is a suggested admission of $5* where proceeds will go to the bike union and Cinecycle.