Did you know that we should take into account the embodied energy when we compare the consequences of our energy use and transportation? WattzOn provides tools for us to track our energy consumption and compare it to a recommended 2000 Watt lifestyle (as a sustainable lifestyle). Eightlines on Twitter alerts us to the embodied energy of bicycles and e-bikes, which are both much lower than a typical energy efficient car such as the Toyota Prius. (The embodied energy is the energy it takes to create the object, which is then divided over the lifetime of the object.)

It comes as no surprise that a steel frame bicycle has a very low embodied energy at about 7.9 Watts (these numbers are necessarily ball-park). The bike only makes up a tiny fraction of the "2000 Watt lifestyle".

The car is another matter. This calculation was based on the Toyota Prius, one of the more energy efficient cars on the road. The embodied energy makes up 13.5% of the recommended energy use.

[img_assist|nid=3372|title=|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=500|height=409]

Last, the e-bike comes in at 2% of the recommended lifestyle. While the embodied energy is is an order of magnitude larger than the steel bicycle, it is still much smaller than the car. So if you choose an e-bike you might not come off as clean-looking as the bicycle rider, you can still save your guilt for something else (such as newspapers which happen to have a huge embodied energy component - twice that of cars!). E-bikes not only require much less energy to manufacture they require much less road and parking as well as less energy to move.

[img_assist|nid=3373|title=|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=463|height=450]

You may ask why watts? This is their explanation: in order to reduce our carbon footprint, we will have to take into account energy reduction.

A watt is a unit of power that indicates the rate at which you are using energy. For WattzOn, we normalize all of your profile answers (say, flights per year or miles driven per week) down to the second, so that you can see the average power that you are using in every moment of your life.

We chose watts because we want to change the conversation on personal accountability in climate change away from the common "carbon footprint" and towards collective energy reduction. Measuring in power rather than carbon emissions recognizes that it will not be possible to support our current lifestyles with any energy technology that we could implement in the near future - our needs are not sustainable. While there certainly needs to be a reduction of fossil fuel reliance by increasing alternative energy infrastructure, energy reduction will need to be part of any solution to this global challenge.

Mon, 07/03/2006 - 00:00 - PICT0897.jpg ©PICT0897.jpg

(Photo: flickr user martinreis)

Lawyer Albert Koehl makes a good argument, Bells on Bloor activist, in today's Globe and Mail for why the province should put the heat under the cities feet to get more bike lanes before all our glaciers melt:

Ontario planning law already puts a healthy emphasis on cycling, walking and transit. Both the Toronto region's growth plan and the Provincial Policy Statement, which is currently under review, require cities to consider the safety of cyclists. The growth plan directs cities to ensure that bicycle and pedestrian networks are integrated into transportation planning “to provide safe, comfortable travel for pedestrians and bicyclists.”

Unfortunately, the law has just enough ambiguity to allow a “business as usual” approach. By imposing minimum standards on cities - such as the requirement to install bike lanes on roads with specified cycling levels or when road redevelopments take place - the province will move the municipal debate about bike lanes from “if” to “how.”

A change at the provincial level wouldn't just help beleaguered cyclists but also benefit stressed city politicians. Why, for example, should Toronto Mayor David Miller have to spend political capital pushing for bike lanes when that's effectively what provincial law requires anyway? Freed from endless debates about bike lanes, Mr. Miller could spend more time dealing with other pressing issues, such as labour unrest.

He makes a great point: when the highways were built in the 1950s all levels of government were behind creating the infrastructure for cars. If governments are now serious about sustainable transportation they can't leave it to squabbles over individual bike lanes.

[Editors: The Bike Biz directory is now accessible. We forgot to make it public when announcing this.]

Everybody knows that bikes are good for business. But do you also know that business can be good for bikes? Well to show you, I Bike T.O. has created a listing of bicycle-friendly business (see the top menu under "Bike Biz".

Bicycle-friendly business is meant to be used as an index of Toronto and area businesses that provide service oriented to cyclists or incorporate bicycles as a significant portion of their operations.

When you start down this road you realize there are a number of great small and large businesses that have bicycles on their minds. Take Chocosol, for instance. Chocosol delivers all their chocolate products by cargo bike! They show up at numerous festivals and sell their wares. They even have a bicycle-powered blender.

And of course there are lots of bike stores. The outstanding ones that have bicycle commuters on their minds include Curbside, Urbane Cyclists, Hoopdriver Bicycles, Bike Joint and so on.

And the GTA even has manufacturers, including True North Cycles and Wike Trailers of Guelph; Manuel Cappel on the Toronto Islands making trailers and cargo bikes; Paul Larsen of Invodane in North York with cargo bikes and trikes; and Biseagal, known for their frame building and repair.

And there are those who make deliveries by bike, such as the Courier Co-op.

The list goes on. I hope you find it useful. If you've got a business that you think would fit the list, then please submit it!