Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - Boris bike in front of Westminster Abbey ©Boris bike in front of Westminster Abbey

I'm back! On my return from the land of the Dutch, I had a short stop in London. I immediately took the tube down to Piccadilly Circus, dropped off my stuff at the hostel only steps from the station, and promptly wandered around until I found a "Boris bike" (nicknamed after Mayor Boris, a regular cyclist himself) at a Barclays Cycle Hire rack. For £1 I got 24 hours of access to any of the bikes in the system. There's no better way to see as much as London in as short a time as possible. If you don't already know how this particular system works, Transport for London provides an excellent video:

Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - Barclays Cycle Hire ©Boris Bikes

The cycle hire bikes, proudly waiting to be used.
Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - On the sidewalk because the road is not terribly inviting. I noticed a difference between bikeshare users and cyclists on their own bikes. Boris bikers: no helmet, no reflective vest, either on road or sidewalk, easy pace. Own bikers: helmet, lots of reflective material, look of concentration, on road, hurried pace. ©Gentleman on a Boris bike

A businessman on a Boris bike, heading for a quick after work drink?
Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - Tourists on Boris bikes ©Tourists on Boris bikes

Tourists? It's hard to look up at buildings and pay attention to speeding traffic at the same time.
Sun, 04/17/2011 - 17:18 - Wary London Cyclist ©Wary London Cyclist

Fully prepared to do battle with large white vans.
Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - Cyclist is attempting to take the lane here for some reason. ©Cyclist in traffic

Road warrior takes the middle lane.

In my short time there I observed a sharp distinction between the cyclists on their own bikes and those on the Boris bikes. Bright reflective, yellow jackets and vests were wide spread, helmets less so. The Boris bikers were more likely to be just wearing regular clothes, no helmets, and use the sidewalk for short distances (at least the tourists).

This was jarring having just come back from the Netherlands where I don't recall seeing anyone in a reflective anything and very few people wore helmets. But then the Dutch didn't have daily uncomfortable encounters with large buses and other vehicles zipping closely by them in narrow bike lanes. And when they do, motorists always give the right of way to cyclists. I don't think it's clear how much of a difference the reflective jackets make, but I could see how local cyclists were searching for some way to increase their comfort in the absence of good bike lanes. To the average Londoner these cyclists probably appear to be a special breed of brave souls.

Sun, 04/17/2011 - 00:00 - London bike lane ©London bike lane

London's very narrow bike lanes, hand-painted symbols and double red stripes just to annoy.

Cyclists often share bus routes.

I was happy to just be able to see London on bike, though I noticed how things still need to improve. London's bikesharing scheme has made cycling appear much more approachable for the average person, and it has made a start with its cycling "superhighways", though it has much room for improvement. Both London and Toronto have a long way to go to reach the level of cycling-friendly Dutch cities, where even the smallest towns have good cycling infrastructure. Toronto already has a higher bike mode share in the core, but with London's quite pro-cycling Mayor, it may soon surpass Toronto. The one thing holding London back is the apparent aversion to separated bike lanes even on their cycle superhighways, and the preference by local officials for cycle training over good cycling infrastructure. This will still keep a lot of the less warrior-types off bikes.

Stay tuned as I go further back in time to cover that below-sea level place they call the Low Countries.

From markenlei.

Today I will be leaving this fine city to go visit relatives and do the tourist thing in the Netherlands (and Belgium). The Netherlands is known for its flatness, polders, rain, and, of course, bicycles. We are looking forward to bike on the expansive bikeway networks across the entire country. We're also quite happy that almost any train has a space for carrying bikes and readily available bike rentals. The trains also run very, very frequently. This may all sound like a magical, fairy land but I'm told by those who've been there that it is true.

So that means my blogging will be fairly minimal for the next couple weeks. If I feel the need to provide yet more gratuitous videos of the Dutch on their bikes (as if there weren't enough already), then I may.

This video is about Rotterdam, Netherland's second biggest city. It's interesting because Rotterdam was leveled during WWII and the city was reconstructed much more to accommodate motor vehicles than older, intact cities. As such cycling rates are a "paltry" 25%. You can see how many of the wide boulevards still share space with dedicated space for cyclists so it's not nearly as dismal as "modern" cities in North America.

Sat, 06/12/2010 - 20:00 - Por Que No on Mississippi cnaPor Que No on Mississippi

Portland is tops for cycling in large North American cities, BikePortland.org reports on a new study, Analysis of Bicycling Trends and Policies in Large American Cities: Lessons for New York, by John Pucher of Rutgers University and Ralph Buehler of Virginia Tech. Toronto, while still higher up in terms of percentage of cyclists commuting (especially in the core), it seems to be falling behind in other measures. Pucher and Buehler make comparisons among American cities on a number of different cycling statistics, including cycling levels, safety and policies. They then compared the data from the large American cities to three large Canadian cities, Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.

Canada overall came out looking good in some areas. Even though cycling rates have been rising faster in the US, the percentage of bike commuters in Canada is still double that of the US.

The number of bike commuters in the USA rose by 64% from 1990 to 2009, and the bike share of commuters rose from 0.4% to 0.6%. Over the shorter period from 1996 to 2006, the number of bike commuters in Canada rose by 42%, and the bike share of commuters rose from 1.1% to 1.3%. From 1988 to 2008, cycling fatalities fell by 66% in Canada and by 21% in the USA; serious injuries fell by 40% in Canada and by 31% in the USA.

These national statistics, however, gloss over local differences. By looking at the city level, Portland pulls strongly ahead. Portland is just super bike-friendly on all fronts: policies, enforcement, bike facilities, cycling levels. And a lot of this was achieved in the last 10 years though the groundwork for this was laid about 20 years ago with some key complete street-friendly policies (such as the long-standing law to dedicate 1% of the state highway fund to footpaths and bike trails).

Toronto is notable for its extensive bike parking program - with its numerous post and rings - but even here some cities are pulling ahead. The report also mentions Toronto's pioneering role in bicycle training and cycling ambassador program, the latter which is no longer operating. Toronto is also falling behind in its bikeway network.

Several central Toronto (and Vancouver) neighbourhoods have bike mode shares that exceed 10%, though the suburban rates are less than 1% bringing the Toronto average down to 1.7%. Lower Manhattan, by comparison, as a bike mode share of 2%. The average for Portland from 1990 to 2009 went from 1.1% to 5.8%, the highest rate of cycling for any large North American city. So Toronto has a pretty healthy cycling population in its core compared to other North American cities, but fails to have the policies to match it.

Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver all have the highest percentage of female bicycle commuters at 35 to 37%, even exceeding Portland which is at 33%. Looking at the gender divide is important in getting a sense of the comfort that cyclists feel using the streets. The split is still pretty awful when compared to Netherlands and Denmark.

Toronto is also an anomaly in that it has a fairly low fatality rate in comparison to its low average bike mode share. This may be a result of cycling being concentrated in central Toronto where traffic can't go as fast. For the cities studied in general there is a pretty good indication that as cycling rates rise the number of fatalities drops and vice-versa. Working to improve the comfort level for all cyclists - young and old, female and male - has been shown in many cities to increase the overall number of people choosing to bike regularly.

Toronto is close to the bottom of kilometres of bike lanes and paths per 100,000 population. At the lower end is New York at 8 km, Chicago 9, Toronto 11. Montreal is at 27 and at the top end is Minneapolis at 70 and Portland at 73. New York and Chicago, however, are quickly catching up so Toronto may soon find itself way at the bottom. Unlike New York and Chicago, Toronto doesn't have a mayor that is prioritizing a good network in the core (though perhaps an unlikely champion in Councillor Minnan-Wong).

Like the Maple Leafs, Toronto may end up having lots of cycling "fans" but fail to be a contender.

I don't think it's all bad. There are signs that cycling is still becoming more popular; more bike stores are opening; Bixi Toronto is launching. It will still be a ways to reach Portland's booming bike industry and culture, but then at least Toronto got bikesharing before Portland did. We can at least put that on our mantle.