The City of Toronto Official Plan envisions a city where active transportation helps to relieve congestion and improve air quality. Yet, right now less than 2 per cent of the City of Toronto Transportation budget is dedicated to walking and cycling infrastructure.
Now is your opportunity to let the city know that it needs to treat cycling as a serious form of transportation.
Tomorrow, Thursday March 6th, the City of Toronto's budget committee will meet to wrap up the 2008 Operating Budget. The Operating Budget pays for the staff that runs programs and services. For several years now cycling activists have been trying to get increases in this area without success. Although we welcome the 2008 capital budget increase in transportation services from $3.0 million to $5.5 million for cycling infrastructure (needed to install the substantial increased amount of 50 km of on-street bike lanes scheduled for this year) it is now time to ask that the cycling safety, education and promotion programs also receive a similar much-needed boost.
Martin Koob of biketoronto.ca has posted a succinct summary here. It includes an outline of the Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation's (TCAT) bike-related recommendations.
They asked council to:
- Double the current funding dedicated to cycling promotion, safety and education staff and programs – like Bike Month and Kids CAN-Bike Camps – from $164,000 to $328,000 in the City Planning operating budget.
- Fund a full-time trails and pathways planner to coordinate the planning, consultation, construction and maintenance of bikeway network infrastructure projects in Toronto’s parks – approximately $80,000 in the Parks, Forestry and Recreation operating budget.
Read TCAT's full letter to the Budget Committee here.
As a member of the Toronto Cycling Advisory Committee I wrote a letter in support of increasing funding for Kid's CAN-BIKE Camp. The camp has been an overwhelming success, garnering awards and nothing but positive feedback. In our attempt at creating a healthy city, I believe it is crucial that we teach young people that cycling is not only a viable, but also valuable form of transportation. The camp expansion plan focuses on the city's priority neighbourhoods.
To say that the Parks portion of the Bike Plan is way behind schedule is an understatement. Although it is heartening that the city now has a plan to get the on-street portion of the Bike Plan back on track, the Parks portion of the Bike Plan (off-road trails) isn't even scheduled -- let alone funded -- to be completed on time.
So, will a 'strong' mayor hold up bikes?
The Deputy Director of Communications in the Mayor's office, Stuart Green, says that when the Transit City plan is finalized the capital plan will include bike lanes. (The Metrolinx discussion paper on active transportation is available here.)
"We are hopeful that we can include other streetscape improvements (bike lanes, sidewalks, trees) in the transit project budget," says Green when asked if the Transit City funding would help to cover the cost of bike lanes. He added, "The delays in bike lane implementation in the past were due less to a shortage of money than to organized opposition using the consultation process to stall projects. We have focused on improving the process which should allow more money to be spent in the future."
The recent streamlining of the bike lane approval process (see City Council decision documents, January 29 - 30 pages 4 - 5) is exactly why we now need to talk about an increase in funding. Now that we’ve (hopefully) eliminated the mechanism for endless ‘push back’, we will need a steady -- and steadily increasing -- amount of funding to complete Bike Plan on time. It takes money and staff time to get the paint on the ground, and as the city plans to install 75 km in 2009 and 90 km each year following to completion, I think it is absolutely reasonable to inquire as to the commitment for that funding.
But, for now, let's focus on the 2008 Operating Budget -- this Thursday is the best opportunity to ask that these bike-related improvements be included.
Once the Budget Committee finalizes the budget on Thursday it will be forwarded to the Executive Committee for its approval on March 25th and then on to City Council for final approval on March 31st.
Shelley Carroll, Chair email@example.com
Paul Ainslie firstname.lastname@example.org
Maria Augimeri email@example.com
A. A. Heaps firstname.lastname@example.org
Joe Mihevc email@example.com
Gord Perks firstname.lastname@example.org
Kyle Rae email@example.com
With special thanks to Martin Koob at biketoronto.ca
Crossposted to Spacing.ca/wire.
Luke (not verified)
Tammy, thank you for theThu, 03/06/2008 - 23:26
Tammy, thank you for the brief. Your efforts are appreciated. In the hope of bolstering their odds of success and the involvement of this blog's patrons, would it be too much to ask that future updates benefit by greater lead times? One day before the fact effectively precludes participation by those that drop by here casually or are too busy react immediately.
Reading through the TCAT's letter of recommendations I'm struck how modest are the funding requests. Another $165K (for a total of $330K) toward cycling promotion/education and $80K for a cycling specific planner for Toronto Parks are the two recommendations devoted exclusively to cyclists. There are also proposals concerning $5.3 million and the 'Public Realm Office' - sounds Orwellian! - and 'Clean and Beautiful City initiatives', entities whose concerns vis cyclists can be considered peripheral.
TCAT's letter is thoughtful, reasonable and measured. Unfortunately in its scope and tone, it seems uninspired and innocuous. I'm not versed in political protocols; if this is just the tone of bureaucratic discourse, excuse my ignorance. But it's dispiriting that passion appears excised from a process crucial to implementing the agenda. I wonder if there's anything to lose by being a bit more unreasonable and strident. The squeaky wheel gets the grease.